Top Galatians Commentaries

I’m nearly halfway through the first college course I’ve ever taught at Lincoln Christian University (the Las Vegas extension). Since the course is on Galatians, which is what my PhD research at the University of St Andrews under Prof. N. T. Wright focuses on, I thought it might be a good idea to provide a few comments on the commentaries I find most helpful for those of our readers who are planning on working through Galatians for either personal devotions, group Bible studies, small groups, or pastoral ministry.

Here are my top English-language commentaries on Galatians (in alphabetical order).

James D. G. Dunn (BNTC) provides a semi-technical commentary from a ‘New Perspective’ perspective. Dunn has condensed his top-shelf scholarly research into a very readable and insightful commentary. If you are allergic to the New Perspective on Paul (or if your denomination is) then I wouldn’t make this your go-to resource. But I do think it’s important to realize how thoroughly Protestant and Evangelical the New Perspective position can be, and James Dunn demonstrates this.

Richard Longenecker’s (WBC) commentary on Galatians is regarded by many to be the best (and for good reason). It is certainly the most technical and most thoroughly researched commentary. A good knowledge of Greek is a must. Longenecker’s key contribution is his attention to epistolary devices within the letter in comparison with ancient letter-writing. These details are both helpful and intriguing (though not necessarily convincing at every turn).

Thomas Schreiners (ZECNT) commentary comes from an evangelical and broadly Reformed perspective. It is scholarly and pastoral with a layout that is very reader-friendly (unlike the WBC). While I disagree with Schreiner’s perspective on ‘works of the law’ and a few other minor issues, I find this to be a wonderful commentary. This is the commentary I’ve required for my Galatians course and I anticipate doing the same in the future.

Ben Witherington III may have written my favorite commentary on Galatians. I don’t agree with everything (especially his insistence on Galatians as a piece of deliberative rhetoric), but I often find myself nodding my head in agreement quite often as I read his commentary.

There are several other notable English-language commentaries that are also worth mentioning here — those by H. D. Betz (Hermeneia), F. F. Bruce (NIGTC), Scot McKnight (NIVAC), E. D. W. Burton (ICC), Frank Matera (Sacra Pagina), and others — but more importantly, there are some commentaries that I would not recommend for pastors and devotionally-minded laypeople. These are the commentaries of J. Louis Martyn (Anchor Bible) and Martinus C. de Boer (New Testament Library). These two scholars represent what is commonly called the apocalyptic reading of Paul. The distinct emphasis of these writers is a Barthian sense of God’s radically new activity in the cross and the outpouring of the Spirit, and thus, a discontinuity with salvation history (i.e. Israel’s story). Additionally, both Martyn and de Boer place less emphasis on human responsibility to believe and embrace the gospel personally. Salvation is viewed as a cosmic rescue mission (rectification), and whereas such a scope is undoubtedly consistent with Paul (cf. Rom 8), it contains a quasi-universalist soteriology in the commentaries of Martyn and de Boer. If one is interested in academic research on Galatians, then these commentaries ought to be engaged seriously and critically (of course, these commentaries are not wholly devoid of insight). But if one is ultimately interested in commentaries for preaching the text of Galatians, or for similar purposes, then I would recommend that these commentaries be avoided.

I’d also say that if you’re interested in reading commentaries from church history you should check out John Calvin first (though, of course, I don’t like everything he says). I’m not a big fan of Augustine’s commentary, and even less so in regards to Martin Luther (whose 400 page commentary essentially tries to argue that every verse in Galatians is about justification by faith). From the patristic era, I found St. Jerome’s commentary to be very enjoyable.

In the near future commentaries from D. A. Carson (PNTC) and Douglas J. Moo (BECNT) are due out, which I anticipate to be more-or-less in line with Tom Schreiner’s commentary; N. T. Wright will have a commentary in the Two-Horizons series; Marion L. Soards, whose commentary will likely be very similar to J. L. Martyn and Martinus C. de Boer, is due to have a commentary in the Smyth and Helwys series; and also, commentaries by Matthew S. Harmon and Joel Willitts, two younger scholars who have written valuable studies on Galatians already, are anticipated.

If there was such a thing as a Biblical Studies Genie I’d wish for Mike Bird to write a Galatians commentary! : )

John Anthony Dunne

You might also enjoy…

13 responses to “Top Galatians Commentaries”

  1. Kevin C

    Ditto on Mike Bird! When can you set us straight on Galatians?

    1. John Anthony Dunne

      I would love to write a commentary on Galatians!

      1. John,

        Now that Stanton has passed, I hear the ICC is in need of a replacement.

        Cliff

        1. John Anthony Dunne

          Have they named a replacement? I certainly couldn’t get that gig!

  2. Why do you think Galatians isn’t deliberative?

    I think I see Paul trying to remind the Galatians about what he preached in the past about the relationship between the law of Moses, the gospel about Jesus, and restraining the desires of the flesh. So I guess I it as forensic.

    1. John Anthony Dunne

      I think it is more deliberative than forensic if we’re talking broad categories. But when this rhetorical grid is applied to Galatians (and the rhetorical handbooks from Quintillian and others are referenced) it seems clear that all attempts to force Galatians into a form of classical rhetoric doesn’t work. There are several monographs on this subject that attempt to look at the rhetorical intentions of units within Galatians, rather than the letter as a whole, and that seems more plausible to me.

      1. Ok, that makes sense. So Galatians 5, wherein Paul argues that his understanding of the gospel includes commands to “crucify the flesh” and “love your neighbor as yourself” might be a forensic unit, Galatians 6 is a move into the deliberative frame (don’t destroy each other…do good to all especially the house of God), and the earlier chapters might be other species of rhetoric all together?

  3. Mike Bird

    Thanks for the vote of confidence. I’ve thought about writing a Galatians commentary some day. Too many works in the pipeline at the moment including an 800 page systematic theology, a NT Intro with Tom Wright, plus books on Gospels and Paul. But maybe some time after that! My forthcoming An Anomalous Jew: Paul among Jews and Christians might be a good foretaste.

    1. John Anthony Dunne

      You are certainly very busy. I’d like to learn your ways! Maybe there’s a Galatians commentary in your future. And if so, I will most likely enjoy it a lot.

  4. Thanks for the mention, John. Now that my Philippians commentary is close to being done, I’ve started work on Galatians. Prayer appreciated!

  5. […] little over a year ago I wrote a post about the Top Galatians Commentaries. For that list I chose the 5 best in terms of teaching the text the closest to how I think it […]

  6. […] John Anthony Dunne (April 2013) offers Dunn, Longenecker, Schriner and Witherington as his best in his survey. […]

  7. Jeff Martin

    Dr. Dunne,

    I would have to disagree completely that Martyn would be a bad thing to use for pastors. As a pastor I have found it immensely helpful and he doesnt shy away from controversy. I agree with you that Witherington and Schreiner should be in the mix as key ones to read, but I don’t agree that Dunn’s or Longenecker should be. Charles Cousar’s commentary is another unique perspective that cannot be missed. He is very learned regarding this topic of law vs gospel. Burton and Lightfoot and Chrysostom are always stimulating. If there was someone I would like to see write a commentary on Galatians it would be someone who is a big fan of Nils Dahl.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *