The Genre Studies Gap with Professor Jeannine Brown and Dr. Andy Judd (Podcast)

This episode is a Live recording with audience of a discussion about genre with Professor Jeannine Brown and Dr. Andy Judd. The event was sponsored by Bethel Seminary, Ridley College (Melbourne), and The Two Cities podcast. Following up on our episodes on genre with each of them, we answer audience questions and dig deeper into the topic.

Professor Jeannine Brown is David Price Professor of Biblical Foundations at Bethel Seminary and the author of Embedded Genres in the New Testament: Understanding Their Impact for Interpretation (published by Baker Academic).

Dr. Andrew Judd is Deputy Principal and Lecturer in Old Testament at Ridley College (Melbourne) and the author of Modern Genre Theory: An Introduction for Biblical Studies (published by Zondervan).

Team members on the episode from The Two Cities include: Dr. John Anthony Dunne.

You can find this new episode on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Overcast, Breaker, Anchor, or wherever you get your podcasts. Check it out, subscribe for weekly episodes every Wednesday, and please give us a rating and review!

John Anthony Dunne

You might also enjoy…

  • Obsession with special guest Dr. Laura Robinson (Podcast)
    Carrying on with spooky season, in this episode, we discuss the 2026 film, Obsession. We’re joined by a special guest, Dr. Laura Robinson, who teaches NT as an adjunct at Butler University and Christian Theological Seminary, co- hosts the New Testament Review podcast, writes at her Substack, Not Peer Reviewed, and has a forthcoming publication called That’s Not What the Bible Says (Eerdmans). Over the course of our conversation, we discuss monkey paw stories, possession narratives, wish fulfillment, coercion, and what “love” has to do it. Team members on the episode from The Two Cities include: Dr. John Anthony Dunne, Dr. Brandon Hurlbert, and Rev. Dr. Madison Pierce.
  • Widow’s Bay (Podcast)
    In this episode, we’re talking about the Emmy Award-winning show on Apple TV, Widow’s Bay. We discuss our favorite moments, why it’s such a great…
  • Concerning Dust and Ashes with Professor Brandon Grafius (Podcast)
    In this episode, we’re joined by Dr. Brandon Grafius, who is academic dean and professor of biblical studies at Ecumenical Theological Seminary in Detroit, Michigan,…
  • Be Afraid with Dr. Kutter Callaway (Podcast)
    In this episode, we are joined by Dr. Kutter Callaway, the William K. Brehm Chair of Worship, Theology, and the Arts and Associate Professor of…
  • Death of the Pastor’s Wife with Special Guest Aimee Byrd (Podcast)
    CW: Abuse, Spiritual Abuse, Grooming, Self-Harm In this episode, we’re joined by special guest Aimee Byrd to help us debrief the three-part docu-series on Netflix,…
  • The Four Senses of Scripture with Dr. Patrick Schreiner
    In this episode we’re joined by Dr. Patrick Schreiner, who is Professor of New Testament and Biblical Theology, Gene and Jo Downing Endowed Chair of…

One response to “The Genre Studies Gap with Professor Jeannine Brown and Dr. Andy Judd (Podcast)”

  1. Tom Peters
    Tom Peters

    Thank you for this interesting discussion of genre in scripture. My question is simple. It is clear from Dr. Brown’s excellent book that Jesus during his earthly ministry told riddles to his followers and his other listeners. Does Jesus also tell riddles through other Biblical “authors” in his capacity as the risen Lord? If he can, which I assume he can if he chooses to, did he embed a riddle in Paul’s description of the “final” judgment of believers in 2 Cor. 5:10. The riddle is this: why did Paul mention the physical body, the Soma, in the context of a passage outlining the final judgment of believers (when believers are by definition no longer in their physical, earthly bodies, that is, in the Soma), if such a judgment is futuristic and apocalyptic in nature? Stated differently, is the risen Lord telling us through a riddle that theological speculations about some “intermediate state” for believers after their physical death, or perhaps some vague form of “soul sleep,” represent a misreading of his intentions with respect to the timing and nature of judgment, at least for believers; and that instead he wants us to know that he judges believers “finally” in this life, so that immediately upon their death he proceeds to resurrect them bodily for eternity. In other words, there is no “waiting room” for eternity.

    Indeed, Jesus seems to say this very thing in Matt. 24:31 (NIV) in his description of the Second Coming: “And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.” The Greek text reads: καὶ ἀποστελεῖ τοὺς ἀγγέλους αὐτοῦ μετὰ σάλπιγγος μεγάλης, καὶ ἐπισυνάξουσιν τοὺς ἐκλεκτοὺς αὐτοῦ ἐκ τῶν τεσσάρων ἀνέμων ἀπ’ ἄκρων οὐρανῶν ἕως [τῶν] ἄκρων αὐτῶν. This verse suggests the notion of many active, resurrected bodies exploring the heavens, not mere disembodied spirits residing for a time (perhaps a very long time, see the example of the repentant thief) in some hazy, rather unfulfilling, and largely joyless intermediate state (at least when compared to the glorious state of eternal bodily resurrection).

    The bottom line is that Jesus may be using an embedded divine riddle in Paul’s writings (perhaps without Paul’s conscious understanding at the time) to correct our flawed, and (if I might say) rather unwieldly and somewhat wooden, understanding of the nature and timing of judgment. Perhaps Jesus disapproves of the “cottage industry” of apocalyptic writings and speculations that seem overly complicated and not in keeping with the direct and immediate way that Jesus tends to address and resolve issues. For example, in John 11:24 look at what Martha said to Jesus regarding her brother Lazarus (NIV): “‘Yes,’ Martha said, ‘he will rise when everyone else rises, at the last day’.” Much to Martha’s delight and surprise, Jesus went ahead and raised up Lazarus with dispatch. In other words, Jesus’s response to Martha’s disbelief was uncomplicated, direct, and immediate, just as it is, and will be, with his followers upon their physical death.

    Perhaps our Lord wishes our focus to be on his relationship with us in this life rather in some distant future, which we cannot possibly comprehend anyway. Compare John 3:12 (NLT): “But if you don’t believe me when I tell you about earthly things, how can you possibly believe if I tell you about heavenly things?” Recognition that the “Judgment Seat of Christ” is in the here and now would certainly seem to do just that. Now that would be a wonderfully enlightening use of the exegetical tool of genre in scripture.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *