Come, Let Us Go Out into the Wilderness

The more I read Hebrews, the more I am convinced that Auctor wanted his readers to see themselves as members with OT Israel in their wilderness journeys. I often wonder why Hebrews includes discussion about angels, Moses, the high priest, sacrifices, the tabernacle, and other OT images; but lately I am beginning to think that we as believers are to see ourselves in the a new kind of wilderness, exiled without a home of our own. While we are in this new sort of wilderness, awaiting of final eschatological rest, we also have similar institutions and regulations for worship much like those of Israel.

For example, Israel had their Apostle (Prophet) Moses. He was the messenger sent by God to communicate to Israel the Old Testament Covenant (Heb 3.1ff). We also know that the angels played some kind of role in the giving of the Law according to Paul (Gal 3.19). But for Christians, we have the great Apostle of our confession Jesus Christ (Heb 3.1). He is God’s last and final word and spokesman, appointed by God as His Son to deliver the final word (Heb 1.1-2).

Also, much like Israel suffered in the wilderness and was tempted, Christ also suffered and was tempted, yet without sin (Heb 2.18). We know from the Torah and the quotation from Ps 95 (94 LXX):7-11 that the Israelites did not pass their test, but rather they rebelled in the wilderness, their hearts hardened to God and his faithfulness. We also know that that generation did not enter into the rest which was promised them. Now, for us who remain faithful a Sabbath rest is waiting.

There is also the establishment of a new priesthood and a new high priest. Jesus is not only the Apostle of our confession, he is also the high priest. Much like in the wilderness, the people of God have a high priest who ministers at the altar, but this altar is in heaven. Auctor tells us that “We have such a high priest, who has taken his seat at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens, a minister in the sanctuary and in the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, not man” (Heb 8.1-2). The reason for a new priesthood is due to the fact that their has been a change of Law. The Old Testament Covenant contained the cultic sacrifices for the sin of the people, and these sacrifices were a perpetual reminder of the need for redemption and cleansing. The Old Testament Covenant was officiated by the Levitical priesthood. But Christ, by means of his death established a New Covenant (Heb 8.8-13) and a new priesthood which the people of God now operate under.

Further, we are also not left without an example of how we are to live under this New Covenant. The readers of Auctor’s letter were suffering and facing difficulties for their faith in the Messiah. They were being publicly shamed and mistreated by those around them, and this was leading them to question God’s promises and faithfulness. This is not dissimilar to what the Israelites were going through as well in the wilderness. Auctor did not want to see his readers fall in the wilderness and perish on the way to rest, so he reminded his readers of lives lived in the face of suffering (Heb 11). While they may be tempted to think that they were experiencing their sufferings alone, they were to be encouraged that the faithful men of the OT experienced similar kinds of suffering. But the greatest example of suffering is seen in the life of Jesus. For this reason, believers are exhorted to “Fix our eyes on Him, the author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God” (Heb 12.2).

The wilderness motif in Hebrews should be in the back of our mind as we read this incredible book. In closing, many have noted Auctor’s focus on the offering of sacrifices is an interpretive key to dating Hebrews before the fall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD. This may be so, but I find it even more interesting and compelling that there is no mention of the temple itself, but rather the focus is on the tabernacle. By focusing on the Tabernacle and the wilderness experience of Israel, Auctor wants his readers to put themselves in the wilderness with OT Israel.

What are your thoughts?

You might also enjoy…

3 responses to “Come, Let Us Go Out into the Wilderness”

  1. James Mace

    One reason it is important the book was written before A.D. 70 is that things changed at that time. The kingly rule of Jesus was vindicated with the destruction of apostate pseudo-Israel which the Law of Moses demanded and Jesus prophesied.

    Yet even before A.D. 70, Jesus’s kingly rule was taught in Hebrews.
    Heb 1:8-9 “But of the Son [quoting Ps 45:6-7] He says, ‘YOUR THRONE, O GOD, IS FOREVER AND EVER, AND THE RIGHTEOUS SCEPTER IS THE SCEPTER OF HIS KINGDOM. 9 YOU HAVE LOVED RIGHTEOUSNESS AND HATED LAWLESSNESS; THEREFORE GOD, YOUR GOD, HAS ANOINTED YOU WITH THE OIL OF GLADNESS ABOVE YOUR COMPANIONS.’”
    Cf. Jesus crowned in Heb 2:9.
    Heb 12:28-29 “Therefore, since we receive a kingdom which cannot be shaken, let us show gratitude, by which we may offer to God an acceptable service with reverence and awe; 29 for our God is a consuming fire.”

    The “consuming fire” refers to ultimate covenant curses falling on the breakers of the OT (I did a special study on this). So, being after the final disappearance of the Old Covenant (cf. Heb 8:13), we are not in the wilderness now but in the everlasting covenant kingdom of the ultimate Son of David.

    We are to take stewardship over the world under Christ the King, not abdicate that with a wilderness mentality (cf. the steward over ten cities vs. the worthless slave in Luke 19:11-27; cf. Matt 25:30). At least by after A.D. 70 the Jordan was crossed and kingdom established, so any wilderness motifs in pre-A.D. 70 Hebrews were temporal and now superseded by more challenging responsibilities.

  2. James,

    Thanks for the response. While I agree with you on many points, I am hard pressed to see any wilderness motifs as being completely superseded. I tend to see Hebrews within the grid of already-not-yet eschatology. While Christ has indeed inaugurated his kingdom and he is indeed ruling now, nevertheless we still await the final consummation of that kingdom. Therefore, we are still in the wilderness waiting for the final, eschatological rest.

    Cliff

    1. James Mace

      Rather than there being a dichotomy of all-or-nothing–wilderness or complete global submission–we are rather in the middle ground analogous to the conquest of Canaan. That is why I said we have crossed the Jordan. It seems you want us still in the wilderness and not getting on with the business of Joshua/Jesus. We are to spread submission to Him until all is accomplished, not wander in the wilderness. We must obey in the difficulties of conflict between church and world, not remain isolated in the wilderness paying for past corporate sins.

      After the apostate among Israel were purged–both in Sinai and out of Israel A.D. 70–the people of God moved into a stage of expansion into the world. We were never meant to misunderstand as if we remain thousands of years in the wilderness (although such sentiments have become popular with some Anabaptists, pietists, pacifists, et al., who lead to abdication of our responsibilities to the world).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *