Less Knowledge = More Power

The Industrial Revolution changed the world. It made possible much of the wealth and prosperity that would have otherwise remained elusive. But now, it also is destroying the environment and dehumanizing laborers. The good of the Industrial Revolution obscured the bad. The consequences, though they could have been predicted (and maybe were by some) remained unforeseen by the majority.

About six month ago I lost my iPhone. I dropped it from my third story balcony, watched it plummet to the concrete driveway and shatter into a thousand pieces, each flying in a different direction. It was disheartening to say the least.

This was because it was my lifeline to the Information Age. I had the answer to everything in my pocket. Six months later I still get mad when I can’t remember a date, name, or fact and have no way of accessing it. It’s like I’m drowning in my own brain, reaching up and grasping at the surface just to get some informational air. But, the longer I have spent only having temporary contact with the Internet has actually made certain parts of my thinking sharper.

It may seem counter intuitive, but the infinite wealth of knowledge at our fingertips can have an adverse effect on our intelligence. I don’t store facts in my brain the way I use to. I don’t form my own opinions about what I read without browsing through hundreds of others. I fail to make connections between pieces of information because someone else has already done it for me. This is the prison that the information age can easily become. A prison which I have been only slightly liberated from through the loss of my iPhone. I have to store facts in my head again.

My thinking gets weaker when my brain doesn’t have to work. A great example is Google Translate. There are far too many students that rely on Google Translate to get through their second language. Instead of slowly and painstakingly working through the material themselves – allowing for mistakes because they refuse to look anything up the first time – students just drop the sentences into the translator and write whatever pops out. Maybe this doesn’t work all of the time, but it is an alarming habit and a great example of how the information age has hurt human intelligence.

How about GPS attached to every automobile? I drive around the streets of LA a lot for my job. A job that I only got after I broke my iPhone. At first, it was brutal. I got lost too often to casually admit. But after having to rely on my memory of streets that I had driven down before, and make connection in my mind pertaining to which streets will intersect, I have become better at navigating. I can test out new routes. I can alter my course without the aid of a navigation program.

Just like the Industrial Revolution, the Information Revolution has changed the world for the better. I can read anything, watch anything, download anything, and contact any person with little more than the will to do so. This is, for the most part a good thing. But I fear that there is an impending downside to freedom of information that, if left unchecked and unchallenged, can begin to unravel this and all subsequent generation’s effectiveness as thinkers, communicators, and innovators. There are, I believe, and unforeseen consequences.

Ladders are only used when necessary. I get the sense that information technology is used like a bunch of basketball players carrying around ladders to dunk. They don’t need them. And eventually, if they never practice without the ladder, they’ll lose the ability altogether. I need to continue to force my own brain to do the heavy lifting and only use these new tools when I have tried everything else.

A muscle doesn’t get any stronger unless you use it.

You might also enjoy…

5 responses to “Less Knowledge = More Power”

  1. Geoff Alfassa

    Thanks for teaching me this instead of letting me figure it out on my own. I am becoming more dependent on Andrew Kelley posts for learning 🙂

  2. Sean T.

    Andrew,

    I don’t know if you are aware of this, but next week is “Screen-Free Week.” Excellent post. We need more people like you to warn our generation of the potential dangers of all our cool, hip, innovative, smart technology. I don’t have an iPhone for the very reasons you outlined above (I would also play too many games). Thank you for your insight and your candor.

  3. Plato’s Socrates made the exact same argument against the technology of writing, shortly after telling some kids to get off his lawn while spraying them with a garden hose.

    All snark aside, I disagree. I’ve seen a lot of arguments on both sides of the “Is Technology/Google/Wikipedia Making Us Dumber/Smarter?” while the only safe conclusion I think we can arrive at is that it is making us think differently.

    It is true, as Socrates saw with writing, that manifesting thoughts and ideas in some external form allows us to stop remembering those things. “Therefore,” the argument often goes, “the quantity of things we memorize decreases,” and thus we are all dumber for it. If you measure intelligence by a capacity for memorization, this is true, but I don’t, so it isn’t–as far as I can tell.

    As with writing, our exponentially growing array of information gathering, storing, organizing, and searching technologies are doing the heavy lifting that our brains never could on their own. I believe this frees us–while we aren’t watching funny cat videos–to spend more time comparing and analyzing information, when before we would have spent much of that time simply trying to store it in our brains– brains that are prone to wild inaccuracies and delusions of certainty.

    1. Andrew Kelley

      Okay. I agree and disagree with your comment. But I think that your remark does bring out a nuance that I failed to address in my post. So, because I messed up, I think I’ll probably just say it here. I have more of a problem with the way that people use information technology and less of a problem with the fact that they use it. It is too often used as a crutch instead of a sword (maybe not the best analogy). If IT is used to augment humanities ability to think and communicate, I am all for it. Unfortunately, this isn’t always the case. Google Translate is, I think, I relatively good example. I can struggle through learning a language using technology to aid me, or I can make it do it for me, and never learn the language. But, I see your point, and it is, in my opinion, an appropriate criticism of my thoughts.

  4. Jon

    Agree. Knowledge is very different than wisdom. Abraham Lincoln only had two books he had access to during his early years. Aesop’s Fables and the Bible. That was enough for him. Why? Because he actually had to THINK about what he read. Today most people just read without thinking. Information has a higher value than wisdom. I write this from my iPhone which I will now put away for a while…and think….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *