To Occupy Wall Street OR To Serve the World? (Guest Post)

It’s cold in Johannesburg. That surprised me because I always thought Africa was a hot place. That was the first of my expectations dashed upon the rocks of reality there. Accompanied by ten people, including seven high school students, I walked around an astonishingly large ghetto with bags of bread and canned foods.

To be honest, it felt like a bad joke. I was walking around a neighborhood that contained a dumbfounding 1 million impoverished, starving people with a few loaves of bread and one bag of assorted canned vegetables. It sounds like the making of a gospel miracle. In my case, it was the foundation for what felt like utter defeat.

I only had enough grocery bags to bless six households. I would walk to each door with much anticipation. Inevitably, it would swing open to a group of people that I could only assume was a family. No words were exchanged. Before I could say anything they took the bag and slammed the door. I’d walk to another house, only to repeat the same process. Few people looked me in the eye. They all seemed thankful but simultaneously communicated some kind of silent disdain for me. I am still not sure what to make of it.

I got face to face with a repugnant reality that I had heard about but never witnessed. It evoked many different emotions and ultimately, I went through a painful change.

Manners taught me I should have been offended by them taking my goods without even a “thank you,” but the fact that I’m writing this on a Mac Book Pro sort of subverts that feeling. Either way, it felt hopeless. I could do nothing to help even the people alone in this ghetto. And it was one of thousands of places like it scattered across the globe. Unlike the general sentiment hailed by the poor of America, there is nothing in the good ol’ USA even close to Africa’s poverty.

I can’t think of the last time that I saw a urine river that ran through a North American town because there is no public plumbing. I can, on the other hand, remember people complaining because they couldn’t afford cell phones. Maybe you can see where I’m going.

The last year has seen a surge in protests in the “The Occupy Movement” seeking the welfare of those that are members of the 99 percent. I do not agree with the general sentiment that Americans overall need more wealth, but there is something about the heart of what these protesters are fighting for.

As a Christian, who is supposed to care more about his faith than his fealty, how can I understand the Occupy Movement’s message? If I want to say that the 1 percent has its boot on the throat of the majority in America, then I probably shouldn’t raise the middle finger to the rest of the world who certainly feels the treads of American shoes.

Let me quickly point out that I am not particularly political and I wouldn’t be the first person to hop on the Occupy bandwagon. I get the idea; I just find it to be severely misdirected energy—especially on the part of Christians.

In my personal life, I see more and more young Christians becoming increasingly liberal in their views. This has resulted in many of them taking part in or heavily supporting various Occupations. I hear pundits accuse them of just acting this way to be hip or edgy—and that may sometimes be the case—but the accusation is naïve. Why not applaud them for having a Christ like heart for the poor and abused?

Unfortunately, I feel like so many young Christians are standing around squinting so they can see the fastidiously hidden problems on Wall Street. We need to stop squinting. We should open our eyes wide to the devastating problems that aren’t in our backyard. We are believers in a worldwide kingdom, so they’re our problems too.

I am not advocating some sort of global socialism. I have more to lose than most of the world if that ever happened. I’m also not trying to point an accusing finger, because, somehow I’m sure, its end would curve around back at me.

What I want to do is ask myself hard questions—harder questions than whether or not the wealth in America is appropriately distributed.

When I hear people talk about inequality in the U.S., sometimes I get caught up in it. I can clearly see injustice and feel angered by how rampant and unrepentant it is.

But occasionally, I time travel back two years and hear the creaking sounds of tin and wooden shacks in South Africa that I know are still there. Then I decide maybe my frustrations are a little bit misguided. I remember: I’m Christian before I’m an American.

Andrew Kelley is a life-long member of Hope Chapel and has spent much of his life there in ministry.  For nearly ten years he both volunteered for and was employed by Special Ministries Disability Outreach, a ministry designed for persons with developmental disabilities, as its Program Director.  After that he spent two years serving as Hope Chapel’s High School Ministry Director.  He completed a BA from a Christian University in Southern California and is nearly finished with an MA in New Testament Theology from Talbot seminary.  He hopes to pursue PhD studies after that.  His personal areas of interest are Early Christian Origins, Theology, the cultural relevance of Christian ideas, and how theology can be integrated well with other professions.  He lives with his wife in El Segundo, CA.  His hobbies include watching entirely too much television, battling with his wireless router, drinking unhealthy amounts of Coke Zero and wishing that he read as much as his wife does.

You might also enjoy…

11 responses to “To Occupy Wall Street OR To Serve the World? (Guest Post)”

  1. Ben Camp

    Andrew, thanks for your reflections. I am not sure what your specific contention is in this post. (Perhaps, there is not supposed to be a contention, but surely some sort of exhortation is present.) But, I feel that you are constructing a dichotomy between a vague notion of “service to the world” and the “occupy movement.” I think that this is a false dichotomy. I do not see why these two notions cannot work hand-in-hand.

    I hope all is well my brotha! You heading across the pond for a Phdizzle next year?

    – Bpizzle

    1. Andrew Kelley

      So I don’t think I actually replied to your comment but instead, posted my own. You can catch my response there. But, in terms of the personal questions…doing great. Probably moving overseas in August, not totally sure which school yet, but hopefully somewhere nice.

  2. Andrew Kelley

    Yo Ben!

    I wouldn’t want to promote the idea that both the Occupy Movement and service to the world are mutually exclusive. If I did, that was probably my inability to express myself well. In fact, there may be many senses in which they can work hand in hand. But, it does seem short sighted to demonize the richest in America and not recognize that even the poorest here are the 1% (maybe 10% is a better number) of the world. So, I just want a little more perspective. To be fair, some that I have talked to that are very invested in the Occupy Movement make it a point to communicate that globalization of the idea is embedded in the spirit of their protests. But I don’t think that is the trend.

    Also, yes, my notion of “service to the world” is vague and probably not very helpful in terms of taking action. But I think we can all agree that there are bigger problems in the world than those in America and it is striking to me how much effort and media attention is spent for the poor here and not elsewhere.

  3. Jon Thiele

    Andrew,

    I don’t consider myself to be very political, and (probably to my own fault) I tend to deny a lot of the talk that the world’s economy is crumbling around me as I go about my day-to-day life. It’s easier for me to hold onto the understanding that “God is in control” and move on and do the best I can with what I got. And “what I got” is a LOT more than the average bear; especially from the world’s perspective. From the American perspective, I’m doin “OK”, but by no means living in luxury… Or am I? well, I guess not “luxury” by American standards, but by the world’s standards, I guess that’s a different story.

    Gosh, even trying to explain my thoughts on reading your article I go back and forth! As an American, my idea of “rich and poor” is drastically different from that of the people you were witnessing to in South Africa. It’s all a matter of perspective, I guess. And I suppose a popular American perspective is that we don’t get enough stuff, based on the lifestyle our culture has grown accustomed. Very few of us have had to deal with a river of urine running through ANYWHERE, but we have had plenty of grocery stores, malls and department stores filled with “stuff” to make us believe when we can’t have what we want, when we want, we “deserve” or “have a right” to more.

    I don’t know if it was an intention of your article, but I’m pretty stinking happy with “what I got” now. God IS in control, His purpose IS good (even if the economic balance is a bit off tilt) and reminders like this article are important to keep me humble and grateful. Thanks, buddy.

  4. Bryan Magana

    Thanks for posting this, Andrew. Reminded me to be thankful to God. I, too, sometimes snatch his gifts, then slam the door.

  5. Hi Andrew!

    Okay, well I feel that I should probably comment since I am actually going to be occupying/marching in the general strike tomorrow – ha! Good timing! Also I am a Christian… AND I think people would call me liberal but I actually think I am pretty conservative. I hate that helping the poor = liberal, but whatever… I will be liberal then.

    So the first thing that comes to my mind is politics. I think that it is difficult to compare a “Third World” country to a rich nation like the US because the US could easily be as impoverished as Johannesburg if it were not for the American welfare state. America has a history of being a people group that will not tolerate seeing people dying on the streets from illness or starving to death and setting up laws to support the majority position. So it’s hard for me to think that we should pour all of our energy into serving those throughout the world, because if we were not protecting our rights here in the US then we could easily end up in the same situation as other “Third World” countries.
    This is my favorite Jon Stewart clip on this issue:
    http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-august-18-2011/world-of-class-warfare—the-poor-s-free-ride-is-over

    With this said I absolutely think it’s important to advocate for those suffering around the world (and everywhere!). I am not a fan of short term mission trips to “Third World” countries and the only thing I like about them is that they inspire young people TO care about the poor (sometimes). BUT, with this comes a lot of westernized baggage. Most Christian Americans love to go overseas and are emotionally moved by what they see but are so blinded by peoples cultures and lifestyles that they spend their time handing out food items and clothing. While this is appreciated on some level, the mindset that comes along with this is one that is very White westernized imperialism.
    Here are some articles on that:

    http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/politics/2262/

    http://matadornetwork.com/change/7-worst-international-aid-ideas/

    Before I move into occupy stuff, I also want to say that people ARE really suffering here in America. And I don’t think you are trying to downplay that (I know your background has had experience with people who are suffering). But I hate when people make these comparisons (like in the Jon Stewart video) about poor people in America having air conditioning and cell phones… I just think these are poor comparisons (no pun intended). We are a privileged nation, but who is putting these ideas into all of our heads that make us stand up for equality and equity. The government has been telling us for years that the “American Dream” is to own a home, go to college, have a loving family and two cars in the driveway. So what do people do? They strive after this. They want it. They work hard and they get it. Loan companies tell them not to worry… interest rates won’t go up. And then what do you know, the whole economy collapses right before them and they lose everything. Then what does the government do? Well if it wasn’t enough that they actually KNEW about these horrible loans, they actually have the nerve to take taxpayer money, bail out the 1%, and evict people from their homes (for the record, I don’t generally oppose the bailout but I do think that the bailout money needed to come with some strict terms etc.). Those in power made money off the promise of the American Dream and they will do whatever it takes to keep it.

    So finally, FINALLY, the people stand up on Wall Street and say, “No way”. You see, it’s not so much about the money for occupiers.. it’s about the fact that the 99% is being screwed. Go ahead, take all of our money and cut all of our resources, but just know that we will stand for our rights until the end. After all, this is supposed to be a democratic nation… the majority of politicians are not standing up for what their constituents want, but only what it going to make them more money.

    Well, there is so much more to say as usual but it’s time to get back to work. I HIGHLY HIGHLY recommend watching this documentary. If you do, you will probably be at the next Occupy Protest! 😉

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inside_Job_(film)

    1. Andrew Kelley

      So, would you say that the 99% are justified in their actions because of the evils committed by the 1% (economic oppression, deception, greed)?

      1. What are yo implying by saying “actions”? What actions are you referring to? Violence, camping, or protesting in general?

        1. Andrew Kelley

          Maybe it would be best just to say what I mean and then let you correct me if I misunderstand the occupy movement in general. It appears to me that they would demand, that in one way or another, the economic oppression of the 1% stop, and wealth is more evenly divided.

          I don’t think this is a bad thing at all (at least in theory). What seems ironic to me is that I feel the western world is guilty of the same “crimes” as the 1%. It is because of the poverty or condition of the rest of the world that we are able to have what we have. A great example is Foxconn factories in China. Terrible working condition (beyond what the vast majority of American’s experience) but without them, we wouldn’t be able to have many products (sony, apple, microsoft) at the cost we get them at. Maybe this isn’t the best example, but there are many others that are reasonably easy to find.

          So I want to recognize that before I protest along with a 99%, that I am essentially a member of the upper-class that oppresses the under-class especially if the context is global.

          Although I am not convinced that the occupy protests are a good thing to begin with (but I am certainly willing to budge on that), they would make a lot more sense to me if the context wasn’t just american. I would feel like I am trying to solve a small problem for myself when I am actually guilty of the same crime to a greater degree.

          Finally, I don’t want anything that I say to be meant as an insult to those who are actively involved in any current protests. I think many of them, including you, have very good motivations. I don’t think you’re taking my comments that way, but because tone is hard to communicate in text (especially for novice writers like me) I thought it best to make my “tone” overt. Please read it as a dialogue more than a debate.

          1. Where to even begin/end this?

            I love politics. I love economics. All of this knowledge cannot possibly come out over this blog, and I don’t really care to take the time to try. I highly recommend going back and reading my comment again, and then if you can watching/reading the videos/articles I linked to… this is a good start in understanding why we occupy.

            And ditto on the “tone” thing – I am totally not mad or anything… I just honestly feel like you did not read my comment above so I don’t exactly know where to go from here…

  6. Sorry, not “Yo” but “You”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *