(UN)Christian Music

Last week I reviewed mewithoutYou’s new album, Ten Stories. As I wrote the review I thought about the idea of “Christian Music.” This is something that I’ve been wrestling with for a while. For some Christians, they only listen to “Christian Music” and deem it a sign of impiety to do otherwise. I imagine this is a minority view among evangelicals, but it’s still prevalent. I want to say much more about whether the nomenclature “Christian Music” is appropriate and to situate that within a discussion on the arts generally. But today I will do something slightly different, though I intend for it to set up a future discussion on this issue at a later date.

When I was home in Las Vegas a few weeks back I heard a couple songs on the local Christian radio station that irked me. I’ve heard them before, but this time I attended to them, and really thought about their meaning. At my home the radio is always on, no matter the time of day. We just never turn it off. In all of our family cars, the preset radio stations are all Christian. That is all well and good, but how much of the music that comes out of these radio stations is actually “Christian”?

Here’s the problem: far too many songs on Christian radio are about “going to Heaven.” Now you might think, but that’s a wonderful thing to sing about! Yet I find it problematic for three reasons.

1) It has the potential to condition Christians to disengage. This lack of engagement could be from any number of things: ethics, political involvements, green initiatives, education, etc… An example of  this is from the band Far From Home (FFH) in their song, “Fly Away.” The song begins, “Okay, you win. You caught me daydreaming again, about our sudden evacuation.” Of course, this song is about the “rapture.” As the song demonstrates, the singer is preoccupied with future escapism, singing, “Curiosity has got ahold of me, tell me how its going to be,” and stating, “Don’t ask me why, I keep starring at the sky. It’s just I’m lost in anticipation.” The whole song is about that day when we “Fly Away.”

2) It is simply Unbiblical. Humans were created for this planet. God intended for us to reign over creation on his behalf (Gen 1.26-28) and this is the goal of creation, what all of history is working towards (Rev 21-22). In his new book, How God Became KingN. T. Wright speaks about ‘getting to heaven’ in ancient perspective. He states,

The ancient Jews were creational monotheists. For them, God’s great future purpose was not to rescue people out of the world, but to rescue the world itself, people included, from its present state of corruption and decay (page 45).

It is true that we await a Savior from heaven (Phil 3.19-20), but he comes to us (Rev 19). It is true that Heaven is a real place where God dwells, but heaven comes to us (Rev 21.1-3). The locus of salvation history and all future history is right here. So get comfortable. God’s got a lot of business left to do with this place.

3) This notion has more in common with Gnosticism than orthodox Christianity.

The most problematic thing about much of Christian music is that it is full of Gnostic hope. This is especially articulated through the multiple ways that the idea of “going home” is expressed in “Christian Music.” This sounds far too similar to Gnosticism (and in this regard — in terms of finding where one truly came from — it is more in line with Mormonism, Scientology, etc…). Gnostics believe that the physical realm is inherently evil. Similar to Platonic thought, Gnosticism teaches that the physical body is like a prison cell of the soul. Thus, there is a strong sense that one wants to ‘get back’ to God: to find their ‘home.’ As an example, Building 429 sings in their song, Give Me Jesus, “All I know is I’m not home yet, this is not where I belong, take this World and Give me Jesus, this is not where I belong.” As I think about this line, I simply can’t believe that Christians are singing about exchanging the Earth for Jesus! Jesus is the one who is reigning over this planet and intends to rule upon it for endless ages (Rev 22.5). The problem is not with the Earth. The problem is sin, something alien to God’s good creation. Instead we should sing about how our home has been burglarized and ravished.

Interestingly, there are modern Gnostics still around today. So I stumbled upon a collection of Gnostic ‘worship songs’ and read through the lyrics and listened to the recorded mp3s to see if I’d find similar themes as the so-called “Christian” songs that are played all over the radio.

In the Gnostic worship song, Why Do Mortals Exist? (Mar Samuel/Robert Lloyd), the song begins: “Why do mortals exist? What is our destiny? From what place do we come? How did we get trapped here?” Then the song encourages the listener that “these questions come from Christ, presented to our minds, to open us to truth, the quest of all mankind.” In Our Homeland Is in Heaven (Robert Lloyd), it is declared, “Our Homeland Is in Heaven, the home we are waiting for.” In Son of Eloheim (Robert Lloyd), it says, “Where did we come from?  When did we descend into darkness? As strangers we wander, we seek the Gate of our luminous home.” Similarly, the Gnostic song, Wonder (Robert Lloyd), asks:

Wonder who I am? Wonder am I of the Gods? Wonder where our home is? Wonder if I’ll return to the stars? Wonder why I came here? Wonder why my Parents sent me? Wonder when I’ll die? Wonder how I’ll find my way back home?

May we cease to long for a Gnostic hope and see the biblical vision of new creation!

Conclusion

“Going to Heaven when I die” has become a prominent hope in evangelicalism, especially in America. This can be seen in much of contemporary Christian worship songs. Sadly, this is the same hope of modern Gnostics. Our hope is in the God of the cosmos who desires to redeem all things. Christians are not called to escape, but to reclaim.

 

John Anthony Dunne

You might also enjoy…

12 responses to “(UN)Christian Music”

  1. Theresa Emadi

    Thank you for pointing out the gnosticism that is so prevelant among Christians in America. My eyes were opened to how gnostic I was after reading “This World is not my Home” by Michael Williams. I highly recommend this book.

    Theresa

    1. John Anthony Dunne

      Thanks for your comment Theresa! I completely agree and I loved that book! Sam recommended it to me : )

  2. In some places, maybe a greater Reformed emphasis on feeding on Christ by faith in heaven in the Lord’s Supper, and thence being sent into this world with our ‘hearts and minds in the knowledge and love of God’, would make it easier to align the heaven stuff mentally, because it would help fill that vacuum.

    1. John Anthony Dunne

      Thanks for the comment Lue-Yee, I hadn’t thought about Eucharistic implications.

  3. m campos

    What do you think the appeal of this gnostic hope is? In other words, it seems like its not just a remnant of an old belief system, but that people are attracted to it and practically come up with it on their own. What is it within man that constantly turns us toward this? I believe the answer to this will be helpful.

    You looked at the origin of man to draw out part of an anthropology. Could you clarify what you meant by “God intended for us to reign over creation on his behalf (Gen 1.26-28) and this is the goal of creation, what all of history is working towards (Rev 21-22).”? this may be a terribly obvious and basic question, but it is those that we tend to let go unsaid when we should be assured we are not all thinking the same thing. We ought to be, but its obvious that we Christians are not. Thank you for the thoughtful post. It was very encouraging to hear from someone with the same concerns.

    1. John Anthony Dunne

      I think the appeal is rooted in a desire to “escape” and transcend the mundane and the limitations of our existence. As for God’s intentions to have humans rule on his behalf, this is central to what it means to possess “the image of God.” The image does not correspond to a single faculty of an individual that corresponds to God’s faculties (or to all corresponding faculties), rather it represents corporate humanity’s role as regal figures. The ANE background for this is quite informative. Kings were considered the “image” of the gods and Kings would place images of themselves wherever their rule extended. Within Gen 1.26-28 it is clear that “ruling” over creation is the main function of the Image of God, since this is what is written in this context. Humans were created to rule over creation. So God’s plan in protology will not be thwarted in eschatology. Humans will rule over creation in the new earth. Furthermore, this provides a greater background for the incarnation. Christ is the second Adam who reclaims humanity’s rule over creation: something he is doing currently and will continue to do forever.

      Does that make sense?

  4. m campos

    I think I better understand what you are saying. What does the rule look like? What are we doing/accomplishing in it?

    1. John Anthony Dunne

      I think it looks like Gen 1.26-28. Humanity was created as the regal figures of the created order. I think it looks like good stewardship of God’s creation.

  5. sr

    Jesus actually said he was not the ruler of this world.
    “Jesus answered, ‘My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.’” John 18:36

  6. Jeremy Goad

    The key word there is the preposition ‘of’ (ek).

  7. […] of the restoration of the entire created order (that is, not just resurrected bodies), and “(Un)Christian Music” to highlight how many contemporary “Christian” songs share worrying affinities […]

  8. dale

    I think singing of heaven is good for the church. We need to remember that this world is not all there is for us and we are not to be so caught up in the material things trying to find happiness that we miss the fact that WE ARE MADE TO WORSHIP and have a RELATIONSHIP with HIM.

    Yes, we can become detached from the world…and I think that is a GOOD THING! WE have become so attached to this world we would rather spend time with it than in relationship with God.

    Paul wrote letters about Heave being our future hope and to take courage in the time we will be in the presence of God in heaven. Don’t preach against what the Bible is teaching…you can take things out of context and make it say what you want. Read 2 Corinthians (chapter5)

    We have a hope – By keeping our eyes on the glories of heaven, we can endure our present sufferings. In the end we overcome this world.

    I seek for an intimate, real, physical relationship…I am not fully satisfied just knowing about someone, talking with someone (but never physically seeing them–that is weird), and trusting them with everything about me without the physical contact. It works with me and my wife because I do have that physical contact…I have hope for a relationship with Jesus that is even greater when I leave this world.

    Yes I am detached from this world. I work in it every day. I have friends that are part of it and love it more than their own life. I have to provide for my family…but there is more to my existence than earth. I was not made for earth–I WAS MADE FOR GOD, to be with God (as Adam walked with God in Genesis and had a personal relationship with God), to experience God…the rest of creation was made for earth…But, God said, Let Us make man in OUR IMAGE…to be in the likeness of GOD.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *